Legal Opinion

Lewellyn v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 5, 1914No. Gen. No. 18,728PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles B. Jennings, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley

Under the stipulated facts of this case it appears that on January 4,1911, at Scottville, Michigan, the defendant company received from the plaintiff for shipment a carload of potatoes in good condition and issued and delivered to plaintiff a hill of lading showing that the potatoes were consigned to plaintiff, as consignee, at Sedalia, Missouri. By this act the defendant company impliedly agreed to carry the potatoes safely and deliver the same at said destination within a reasonable time. Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Kirby, 225 U. S. 155, 164. It further appears that prior to the arrival of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. City of Spring Valley v. Spring Valley Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Manistee Lumber Co. v. Union National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bruner v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API