Legal Opinion · Dissent

Agway, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 22, 1975No. 302-72Published

1DissentKashiwa, Judge

My only point of dissent with the majority opinion is the application of the Corn Products1 doctrine to this case. The majority states, and I agree that:

The rule can be stated to be, and we believe is, that Corn Products will be applied in this court to purchases of company stock to obtain a source of supply only if there is no substantial investment intent.

The majority then looks at the intent involved in the decision to purchase through the cooperative system. However, the *699majority opinion does not look at the taxpayer’s intent but transfers the intent to Congress under Int. Rev. Code of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. The United States. The Evening News Association v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. United States v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Waterman, Largen & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Fs Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Illinois Farm Supply Company, an Illinois Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API