Legal Opinion

Ella E. Harrold v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1956No. 14694_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

We have before us on this appeal a somewhat bizarre cause. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue received payment of all income taxes due from petitioner and her then husband for the years 1946, 1947 and 1948. The spouses were then living together as husband and wife. But because the husband, later, after divorce, filed a claim for refund of that part of the taxes paid by him representing his wife’s (petitioner’s) share of the tax on the community income, the Commissioner has reopened the wife’s tax status and assessed a deficiency tax against her. Obviously this was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warburton v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Harrold v. HarroldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Thelma Jo Lange v. R. L. Phinney, District Director of Internal Revenue Service, and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Kimes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  4. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. Demographic Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  5. Don Gilmore and Sue Gilmore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API