Legal Opinion

Hardie, Et Ux. v. Inter-City Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 23, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

In this case the motion to vacate the clerk’s approval of the supersedeas bond herein, and to adjudge that the supersedeas never did become effectual nor operative, should be granted. Hays v. Todd, 26 Fla. 214, 7 Sou. Rep. 851. Such is the appropriate disposition of this matter because the statute requires a bond with “two” good and sufficient sureties to be given and failure to comply with the statutes as to the giving of a bond with “two” sureties constitutes ample ground for setting aside the action or order which the statute makes dependent for its validity on the actually giving of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poyntz v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. Hays v. ToddSupreme Court of Florida · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API