Legal Opinion

Berg v. Gackenbach

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 1, 1992No. CV 89-1726PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEONARD D. WEXLER, District Judge.

In the above-referenced action, here on remand from the Court of Appeals, plaintiff class’ counsel (“counsel”) seeks attorney’s fees and expenses from the equitable fund created by the approximately $31 million settlement1 of the above-referenced action. This Court initially granted a $1,465,809.00 lodestar award, multiplied by a risk enhancement factor of 1.6, for a total of $2,351,694.40, plus $299,672.98 in expenses. (Orders dated November 26, 1991.) After an appeal of the Fee Order by objector, Myron C. Gackenbach (“Gackenbach”), the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., SEC. Lit.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API