Legal Opinion

Schwenker v. Thompson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1929Published

1Opinion

On rehearing.

2Per curiam

The defendant upon this motion complains because all of the questions argued in the case were not disposed of in the opinion, and to some extent it may be said that this complaint is justified. We are again urged to hold that under the rule laid down in Cousins v. Flertzheim, 182 *313Wis. 275, 196 N. W. 250, the plaintiff is estopped to question the validity of the transaction by which the defendant Thojnpson transferred his stock to Hovden. Were there no other question involved than the legal effect of that transaction the argument would have weight, as was pointed out in the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cousins v. FlertzheimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API