Legal Opinion

City of Reno v. Estate of Wells

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1994No. 24667PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1219OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal requires us to determine whether the district court erred when it found that the Reno City Council’s (“Council”) decision to abandon certain real property was an arbitrary and capricious abuse of discretion. NRS 278.480(4) provides that a “governing body” may abandon property if it “is satisfied that the public will not be materially injured” by the proposed abandonment. For the reasons explained hereafter, we conclude that the district court failed to apply the proper statutory test for abandoning real property, and also failed to recognize the substantial evidence of…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. Public Service CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF RENO v. IrvineNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tighe v. Von GoerkenNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. L & T CORP. v. City of HendersonNevada Supreme Court · 1982

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wright v. State, Department of Motor VehiclesNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Clark County School District v. BundleyNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Crain v. Farmers United Cooperative PoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API