Legal Opinion

Hanover County v. Bertozzi

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 18, 1998No. Record 972283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser

Hanover County (the County) seeks reversal of the circuit court’s judgment ordering the County to review A.G. Bertozzi’s (Bertozzi) plats for Sections A through G of his proposed subdivision titled Sugar Maple under the terms of zoning and subdivision ordinances in effect prior to October 9, 1996. Because Bertozzi failed to submit complete applications and plats for Sections F and G before an October 9, 1996 deadline, we will reverse the circuit court’s judgment with respect to those two sections. As to Sections A through E, we will reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hylton Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  2. West v. MillsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. Board of Supervisors v. MachnickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. BOARD OF SUP'RS v. MacHnickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sansom v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  2. Board of Supervisors v. Greengael, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Fritts v. Carolinas Cement Co., GPSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  4. Sansom v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF MADISON COUNTYSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  5. Harvest Christian Center v. Zoning Appeals BoardKing George County Circuit Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API