Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance Co. v. Milonas

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 5, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, then a resident of New York City, obtained from complainant its twenty-year endowment life insurance policy dated July 17th, 1930, wherein provision was also made for payment to defendant of disability benefits. Under the terms of the policy, premiums were payable January and July 17th in each year, with thirty-one grace days allowed. The premium due July 17th, 1932, was not paid within the grace period and the policy lapsed. October 17th, 1932, the defendant, then a resident of this state, made application for reinstatement and complainant granted his application. Default was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. McCormack v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Orient Insurance v. RudolphNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  5. Hemhauser v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carfagnini v. SERVICE LIFE INS. CO. OF OMAHANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Lloyd v. Massachusetts Accident Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Chelsea-Wheeler Coal Co. v. MarvinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. HefnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API