Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Holland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1957No. 36549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. An action for money had and received is founded on the equitable principle that no one ought unjustly to enrich himself at the expense of another, and lies in all cases where another has received money which the plaintiff, ex aequo et bono, is entitled to recover and which the defendant is not in good conscience entitled to retain. Jasper School District v. Gormley, 184 Ga. 756, 758 (193 S. E. 248); Zapf Realty Co. v. Brown, 26 Ga. App. 443 (106 S. E. 748); Brackett v. Fulton National Bank, 80 Ga. App. 467 (56 S. E. 2d 486).

2. The petition in the present case alleges that Mrs. Stewart, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jasper School District v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Zapf Realty Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Brackett v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API