Legal Opinion
Regent Care Center, Inc. v. Hackensack City
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided November 16, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAHN, J.T.C.
This is the court’s determination with respect to cross motions in a local property tax appeal. Plaintiff (“taxpayer”) moved to compel defendant (“municipality”) to produce certain documents after which the municipality cross moved for dismissal of the *322taxpayer’s complaint. The cross motion is based upon the contention that taxpayer failed to timely file its complaint in the Tax Court by April 1,1997 as provided by N.J.S.A. 54:3-21. Since it is this court’s determination that taxpayer’s complaint be dismissed for the reasons hereinafter- stated, taxpayer’s initial discovery motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- AVR Realty Co. v. Cranford Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Centorino v. Tewksbury TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1999
- AVR Realty Co. v. Cranford TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- REGENT CARE v. Hackensack CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Regent Care Center, Inc. v. Hackensack CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2001
- City of East Orange v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Tax Court · 2013
- Southway, Peter & Lena v. Wyckoff TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
- Bear's Nest Condominium Ass'n v. Bergen County Board of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2009