Legal Opinion

Connor v. Becker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1898No. 8328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Blair, J. References: Heartt v. Rhodes, 66 111. 351; Seroggin v. McClelland, 37 Neb. 644; Little v. Blunt, 9 Pick. [Mass.] 488; Wenman v. Mohawk Ins. Go., 13 Wend. [N. Y.] 267; Brush v. Barrett, 82 N. Y. 4=00; -Norton v. IJllam, 2 M. & W. [Eng.] 461; Burnham v. Allen, 1 Gray [Mass.] 496; Neto Hope Delaware Bridge Go. v. Perry, 11 111. 467; First Nat.

Read the full summary

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Blair, J. References: Heartt v. Rhodes, 66 111. 351; Seroggin v. McClelland, 37 Neb. 644; Little v. Blunt, 9 Pick. [Mass.] 488; Wenman v. Mohawk Ins. Go., 13 Wend. [N. Y.] 267; Brush v. Barrett, 82 N. Y. 4=00; -Norton v. IJllam, 2 M. & W. [Eng.] 461; Burnham v. Allen, 1 Gray [Mass.] 496; Neto Hope Delaware Bridge Go. v. Perry, 11 111. 467; First Nat. Bank of Wymore v, Miller, 37 Neb, 500; Holmes v. Briggs, 17 Am. St. Rep, [Pa.] 804; Lord v. Stale, 17 Neb. 526; Bailey v. State, 36 Neb, 808; Hower v. Anltman, 27 Neb. 251;…

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

In this, a suit on a cheek against the drawer thereof, the instrument having been presented for payment to the bank to which it was directed and not paid, the defense interposed by plea in the answer was that of the bar of limitation of the cause of action. At the close of the introduction of the evidence, the trial being to a jury, the presiding judge instructed a verdict for the defendant, which was returned, and in the due course of procedure an accordant judgment was rendered thereon. The plaintiff's present the ease to this court for review!

It is contended for the plaintiffs that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bickford v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. State ex rel. Reed v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Rogers v. DurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Rounds v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Selected Kentucky Distillers, Inc. v. FolowayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wrigley v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank of BeatriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API