Legal Opinion
Reedy v. Werholtz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 10, 2011No. 11-3040PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, a group of inmates in the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC), brought this action against Roger Werholtz, Secretary of KDOC (the Secretary), under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. They challenge two policies set forth in the KDOC’s Internal Management Policy and Procedure (IMPP), which, with a few exceptions not relevant to this appeal, require money obtained by the inmate to be saved for use upon release from prison. IMPP 04-103 requires each inmate to place 10% of funds received from sources outside KDOC into a “forced savings account,” 1…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Overton v. BazzettaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- M.D. Mark, Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Hanh Ho Tran v. Trustees of the State Colleges in ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Luna CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Toevs v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. LefflerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Centennial Archaeology, Inc. v. AECOM, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Zia Shadows, L.L.C. v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.