Legal Opinion

Hasterlik v. Strong

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Attachment.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Alonzo K. Vickers, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Appellants appeal from the judgment entered in this case upon the grounds that the court erred in the matter of giving and refusing instructions and that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the evidence and the law.

Counsel for appellants insist that the verdict and judgment should have included the indebtedness originally contracted by the son of appellee’s decedent. It is insisted that the proof shows an agreement, August 30,1892, that the business subsequent to this date should, be carried on as before, A. Applebaum taking the place of Louis and assuming his indebtedness. Appellants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. v. HaselwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Yapp v. WeaverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Citizens Nat. Bank of Decatur v. DoranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  2. Loeb v. AlexanderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API