Graham v. Harmon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gibson, C.
Judgment passed for the respondent in this action for $219.77, without costs, which sum consists of $12.10 for services rendered by him to defendants, between the seventeenth and twenty-eighth days of December, 1886, and the remainder for a balance due upon an account between them.
The main question presented for consideration here is, whether the findings of fact are supported by the evidence.
The defendants, who were engaged in the business of *182conducting a theater and skating-rink in Eureka, .during November and December, 1886, employed' the plaintiff as their manager, whose duty it…
2Cited by7 opinions
- McCarthy v. Mt. Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Storm & Butts v. LipscombCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Minneapolis Envelope Co. v. VanstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Avery v. Chucawalla Developement Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Banchero v. CoffisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.