Legal Opinion

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3611, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5951 City of Ketchikan, a Municipal Corporation, D/B/A Ketchikan Public Utilities v. Cape Fox Corporation, an Alaska Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1996No. 94-35316Published

1Opinion of the Court

85 F.3d 1381

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3611, 96 Daily Journal

D.A.R. 5951

CITY OF KETCHIKAN, a municipal corporation, d/b/a Ketchikan

Public Utilities, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CAPE FOX CORPORATION, an Alaska corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-35316.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 10, 1995.

Opinion Filed Sept. 6, 1995.

Opinion Withdrawn Jan. 23, 1996.

Resubmitted April 25, 1996.

Decided May 23, 1996.

H. Clay Keene, Keene & Currall, Ketchikan, Alaska, for plaintiff-appellant.

James D. Nelson, Betts, Patterson & Mines, Seattle, Washington, for defendant-appellee.

Appe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. FleischmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Rufener Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API