Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Bridgeport Brass Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 5, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

.HAZEL, District Judge.

This bill in equity is based upon the alleged infringement of claims 1, 2, and 3 of letters patent No. 583,227, dated May 25, 1897, issued to James N. Gunn, for an improvement in card records. The complainants, Gunn & Stanford, are the owners of the patent; the Library Bureau being exclusive licensee under the same. The proofs show that the patentee conceived the invention in M'arch, 1892, and disclosed the same to others. He cut out by hand a set of record cards in the shape or contour described in the specification and afterwards endeavored to have a supply cut by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cawood PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Brill v. Third Ave. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
  3. Ryan v. Newark Spring Mattress Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API