Legal Opinion
Millard v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 13, 1989No. 307-88 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIESE, Judge.
The plaintiff in this case is a retired member of the United States Army whose military pay, commencing in September of 1984 (when he was still on active duty), became subject to a California wage assignment order (a garnishment order) for child and spousal support. In accordance with this order, the Army has been paying part of his monthly salary (now his retirement annuity) to his former spouse. This suit was brought to recover the monies thus withheld, the contention being that the Army’s actions are in violation of the governing statute, 42 U.S.C. § 659 (1982) and its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Allan Wayne Morton v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hicks v. Midwest Transit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Arthur Frank Millard v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Candelario-Del-Moral v. UBS Financial Services IncorpoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Goad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Mora v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.