Legal Opinion

State v. Stogdel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from the Howard Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

Indictment against the defendant for seduction. The indictment was quashed on motion of the defendant, and the state excepted.

The indictment seems to be sufficiently formal, and states, in substance, that the defendant, on, &c., at, &c., had illicit carnal intercourse with one Mary Deeter, a female of good repute for chastity, and under the age of twenty-one years, under a promise of marriage- made by the defendant to said Mary. The indictment is too long, *566and contains too much verbiage and tautology, to justify its insertion in this opinion; But it contains, in substance, a charge of the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hinkle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API