Legal Opinion
Tucker v. International Salt Company
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston
The only question for decision is whether or not under the stipulated facts the defendant in error, the International Salt Company, is doing business in the State of Tennessee so as to be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State.
The trial court held that the Salt Company was not so doing business, sustained the plea in abatement and held that the attempted service of process on the travel ing salesman of the Salt Company who resides in Shelby County to be void.
In the interest of brevity, the stipulation of facts will be somewhat abbreviated. Paul Tucker sued the Salt Company…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bearman v. CamatsosTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- First Flight Company v. National Carloading CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962
- J. Polk Smartt and Isabel Smartt v. Coca-Cola Bottling Corporation (Sued as Cincinnati Coca-Cola Bottling Co.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Mast Advertising & Publishing, Inc. v. MoyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Tamco Supply v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.