Laureano v. Koch
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, with directions to dismiss the proceeding for mootness. We decline to exercise our discretion to retain jurisdiction despite mootness (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 718) for the reason that in this instance the City has in fact published regulations.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Kane.* Taking no part: Judge Alexander.
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allerton Coops Tenants Ass'n v. BidermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Union of City Tenants v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Bryant Avenue Tenants' Ass'n v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Johnson v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- DiScala v. Facilities Development Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1998