Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1959No. 13Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Harlan, whom Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Whittaker join, dissenting.

The question in this case is whether appellee Darlington is entitled to rent to transients (that is, so far as this case *94is concerned, for periods of less than 30 days) a small number of apartments in its building, which is covered by a mortgage insured by the FHA. Darlington’s FHA mortgage was consummated and insured in December 1949. At that time neither the controlling statute, § 608 of the National Housing Act, 56 Stat. 303, as amended, 12 U. S. C. § 1743, nor the regulations issued thereunder, 24…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Darlington, Inc. v. Federal Housing AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956
  4. Darlington, Inc. v. Federal Housing AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API