Legal Opinion

Cecil v. Frost

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided March 2, 2000No. 14-98-01021-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL CANNON, Justice

(Assigned).

Appellants appeal from a summary judgment for appellee (Frost) denying appellants claim for slander and slander per se. In two points of error, appellants contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because (1) the motion for summary judgment failed to address one of appellants’ causes of action, and (2) appel-lee presented no evidence to support his claim that appellants’ slander per se claim was improperly pleaded. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.

Frost reported to the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cincinnati Life Insurance Co. v. CatesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Leyendecker & Associates, Inc. v. WechterTexas Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ronald Marx v. Electronic Data Systems Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  2. David Herrera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  3. Gerald Sansing v. Carlos Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  4. Gerald Sansing v. Carlos Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. HDG, Ltd D/B/A Hunton Distribution v. Kelly Blaschke, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API