McNeil v. Cuyler
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Acting Chief Judge.
In this habeas corpus petition, we must consider whether the district court, in denying a defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, correctly applied the standard set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We conclude that the court did not properly apply Strickland, *445but that it nonetheless reached the appropriate result because the alleged errors of counsel did not prejudice the defendant. Accordingly, we will affirm.
I
The long procedural history of this case begins with the 1974 murder…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Tyrone Anthony GrayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Francis Ordean Reese v. Thomas A. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- State v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Charles Diggs v. David Owens, Superintendent and John Daughn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- McAleese v. MazurkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.