Owens Ex Rel. Owens v. Garfield
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Salt Lake County and the State of Utah.1 Plaintiffs argue that (1) the lower court erred in holding that defendants owed no duty to plaintiffs and (2) summary judgment was inappropriate since genuine issues of fact exist. We affirm the decision of the trial court. Neither defendant owed a legal duty to plaintiffs, and therefore no cause of action for negligence lies.
In a case decided on summary judgment, the facts are considered in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Everton v. WillardSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Jensen v. ConradCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Rollins v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Ledfors v. Emery County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.