Legal Opinion

New Hanover Shingle Mills v. Sanderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1913Published

Appeal from Garter, J., at January Term, 1913, of Pendee. Demurrer to complaint. His Honor overruled tbe demurrer and required defendants to answer over. Defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBeoww, J.

Tbe facts are stated in tbe complaint, and appearing from Exhibits A and B attached to it, are as follows:

Tbe plaintiff owned certain timber and conveyed it to tbe Cape Fear Lumber Company by deed dated 24 November, 1905, wbicb is Exhibit B.

Tbe Cape Pear Lumber Company conveyed a portion of said timber to Cottle & Lewis by deed dated 3 November, 1906, for an alleged consideration of $1,500. Cottle conveyed bis interest to defendant Sanderson.

On 24 November, 1905, a contract was entered into between tbe New Hanover Shingle Mills and tbe Cape Fear Lumber Company providing, among other things,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blevins v. . BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. Womble v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844
  3. White v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. Peck v. . CulbersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Cameron v. . MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API