Legal Opinion

Unifund CCR Partners v. Daniel Zimmer

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 11, 2016No. 2015-086PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEaton, J.

¶ 1. In this appeal, Unifund CCR Partners (Unifund), the alleged assignee of charged-off debt owed by defendant under a credit card account opened with AT&T Universal/Citibank (Citibank), challenges the trial court’s decision entering judgment in favor of defendant in an action for collection. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

¶ 2. Unifund, a debt buyer, is in the business of purchasing large portfolios of charged-off debts from original debt holders in the hope of eventually collecting from the original debtors. On October 25, 2013, Unifund asserted the right to judgment against…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parker v. Town of MiltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Dj Painting, Inc. v. Baraw Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. Town of Charlotte v. RichmondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  5. Kellogg v. ShusherebaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. William Pettersen v. Monaghan Safar Ducham PLLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  2. In re LaBerge NOVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  3. H. Brooke Paige v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. The Bank of New York Mellon v. Daniel T. QuinnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  5. Zev D. Nijensohn v. Michael J. Ring, Esq. & Highland Realty Trust, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API