Legal Opinion
Lanza v. Carlick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 29, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 4, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendants Anthony Carlick and Frank Carlick and the separate motion of the defendant Christopher D. Long for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
*614Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grossman v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Kauderer v. PentaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Jimenez v. KambliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Passarelle v. BurgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ifrach v. NeimanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Pajda v. PedoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Nemchyonok v. Peng Liu YingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Li v. Woo Sung YunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Wiegand v. SchunckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.