Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. Transcon Lines

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1985No. 83-221, 83-222PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

Prior to their accident, Hamlin and Befus were State of Wyoming employees whose sovereign immunity from suit had been removed by § 1-39-105, W.S.1977,1984 Cum. Supp.,1 of the Wyoming Governmental Claims Act, §§ 1-39-101 through 1-39-119, W.S.1977, 1984 Cum.Supp., and both of them were covered by, and their heirs are receiving, worker’s compensation. By reason of the culpable negligence of Befus, both of these State employees were killed in an automobile mishap while in the scope of their employment.

In the district court, the Hamlin estate2 sued the State of Wyoming, purporting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Zancanelli v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Oroz v. Board of County Com'rs of Carbon CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Meyer v. KendigWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Baker v. Wendy's of Montana, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Hamlin v. Transcon LinesWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Eaglemed LLC v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. State v. DieringerWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Stockwell v. Parker Drilling Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API