Legal Opinion

Racine County v. Cape

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 5, 2001No. 01-0740PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. This case concerns the modernization of equipment at James Cape and Sons Co., 1 a business that, among other things, crushes and recycles concrete, which is a nonconforming use under Racine County ordinances. Cape contends that its operation of the modernized crusher system only increases the frequency, intensity and volume of its recycling capabilities and presents no identifiable change in use. We agree with Cape's contention and reverse the order of summary judgment in favor of Racine County. We remand with directions that the trial court enter an order for summary judgment for Cape.

¶…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waukesha County v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Waukesha County v. Pewaukee Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. In Interest of Courtney E.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Foresight, Inc. v. BablCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Lessard v. Burnett County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API