People v. Knowles
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Patrick J. McGrath, J.
The defendant has moved to dismiss the indictment pursuant to GPL 210.25 (3) based upon the allegation that the statute defining the offense is unconstitutional. Specifically, the defendant alleges that section 353-a of the Agriculture and Markets Law is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, and, therefore, violates the due process provisions of the United States Constitution and the New York Constitution.
The void-for-vagueness doctrine requires that a penal statute define the criminal offense with sufficient definiteness that ordinary people can…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ArroyoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2004
- People v. GarciaNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. GarciaNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2004
- State of Iowa v. Michael Jan MentonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
- State of Tennessee v. Timothy A. BaxterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013