Legal Opinion

Santillan v. Sharmouj

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 16, 2008No. 06-5167, 07-2952 to 07-2954UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a jury verdict which determined that the negligent actions of defendants Nasser Sharmouj (“Nasser”) and Zila Sharmouj (“Zila”) at a construction site resulted in serious and permanent injuries to plaintiff Antonio Santillan (“Santillan”). The construction site was owned by Zila and overseen by Nasser. The principal issues on appeal are: (1) whether the jury properly awarded punitive damages against Zila and Nasser, and (2) whether the District Court properly denied certain of Santillan’s requests for costs. 1 For the reasons…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Figueroa v. Buccaneer Hotel Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mark Vitalis v. Sun Constructors, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API