Legal Opinion

Sherburne v. Rippe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hen-nepin county, where the action was tried by Young, J., without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Diceinson, J.1

This is an action under the statute to determine the adverse claim of the defendant to the land in controversy, which at the time of the commencement of the action was vacant and unoccupied. On the 24th day of September, 1858, one John G. Sher-burne owned the land in fee. On that day a judgment for the recovery of money was recovered and docketed in the district court in favor of one Wright, and against John G. Sherburne and another, and the lien thereof attached to this land. On the same day execution was issued on the judgment, which execution was returned in December…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cole v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
  2. Sheehy v. HindsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  4. Flint v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  5. Burk v. FlurnoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1835

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wakefield v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Taylor v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Gilfillan v. ChattertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Willius v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API