Legal Opinion

United States v. James Vincent Tremont

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1965No. 15839PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.

James Vincent Tremont appeals from his conviction, on jury trial, of violating the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312, by transporting a stolen automobile from Elizabeth, New Jersey, to Memphis, Tennessee. The cause was tried in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The proofs easily permitted a jury finding that Tremont stole the car in New Jersey, transported it to Memphis, Tennessee, and sold it there for $4,250,00.

In the following order, we consider such of appellant’s assertions of District Court error as we consider merit discussion.

1…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Poliafico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Henry Marks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. Herbert W. Bray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. United States v. Louis B. Pacheco and John N. Fountain, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. State v. CataneseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. United States v. Archie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. ZeigerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API