Legal Opinion · Dissent

Darr v. Burford

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1949No. 3722Published

1DissentPhillips, Chief Judge

The order discharging the writ was filed in the lower court on April 22, 1948. At that -time, it was regarded as settled law that “Ordinarily an application for habeas corpus by one detained under a state court judgment of conviction for crime will be entertained by a federal court only after all state remedies available, including all appellate remedies in the state courts and in” the Supreme Court of the United States “by appeal or writ of certiorari, have been exhausted.”1 In other words, certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States was regarded as a part of the state remedy for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Wade v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Ex Parte DarrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API