Legal Opinion

Prowler v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The compensation to be paid to the plaintiff for the period of t'me while he was out of employment should be reduced to the sum of $2,080.85, being the amount of full pay, less the amount earned by the plaintiff during his absence from actual duty in the department (Gutheil v. City of N. Y., 119 App. Div. 20; Sutliffe v. City of N. Y., 132 id. 831.) The judgment appealed from is, therefore, modified by reducing the judgment as entered, including costs, to the sum of $2,172.10, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Judgment modified *825by reducing the amount of the judgment as entered to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gutheil v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sinicropi v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. White v. HarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API