Legal Opinion

Goebel v. City of Cedar Rapids

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 28, 1978No. 60408PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

We granted this interlocutory appeal to decide whether persons who receive benefits under Code chapter 411 are barred from maintaining a tort action against the city based on the same injury. Chapter 411 provides comprehensive disability and pension benefits for firemen and policemen under civil service as well as accidental death benefits for their beneficiaries. Plaintiffs are the estate representatives, wives and children of two firemen who were killed in a water rescue training exercise in Cedar Rapids in 1976. The widows and children received statutory death benefits…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Patterson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Doe v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. Leland K. Aubrey and Charlotte R. Aubrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Van Baale v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Snyder v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Mitsuuchi v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Emily M. Bass, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State v. ArtisNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API