Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Echols

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

• Appeal from City Court of Decatur. Tried before W. R. Francis, Esq., Special Judge. Action by W. Y. Echols against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., to recover the value of one bale of cotton alleged to have been received by it for shipment,

1Opinion of the CourtHaealson, J.

— Tbe'undisputed facts of the case are, that aj)pellee, was engaged, on the 11 October, 1888, in buying, selling and shipping cotton, at Hartselle, Alabama; that he caused to be placed that day, on the shipping platform of appellant, eighty bales of cotton, one bale of which, the subject matter of this suit, was marked E., and numbered 241, the weight and price of which was admitted, and during the night of that day, this bale of cotton was lost or stolen, and next morning, there were only seventy-nine bales remaining.

The contention on the part of the appellee is, that he delivered the cotton…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shore v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Sigma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. CavenderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Delta & Pine Land Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API