Rueth v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion
ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING
Bistline, Justice.
In petitioning for a rehearing the Rueths strenuously urge that the Court improperly required of them that they show that the ex parte unrecorded communications between the trial judge and the jury were harmless. That assignment has been given full consideration, and we remain of the opinion that the rule applied was the correct one in view of the factual situation of this particular case. Since the announcement of the opinions in this case the Supreme Court of the United States has had occasion to pass upon the same question. United Stated…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.