Kellogg v. Mack Paving & Construction Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 199, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of Municipal Court, Philadelphia Co., July T., 1915, No. 154, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Luther Laflin Kellogg et ah, trading as Kellogg & Rose, v. The Mack Paving & Construction Company. Assumpsit to recover fees for professional services. Before Wheeler, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $544. Defendant appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 199, Oct. T., 1916, by defendant, from judgment of Municipal Court, Philadelphia Co., July T., 1915, No. 154, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Luther Laflin Kellogg et ah, trading as Kellogg & Rose, v. The Mack Paving & Construction Company. Assumpsit to recover fees for professional services. Before Wheeler, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $544. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were various rulings on evidence as stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Head, J.,
The numerous assignments of error may be fairly disposed of by the consideration of any one of them. They severally rest on rulings of the learned trial judge sustaining objections to a line of questions asked* by the learned counsel for the defendant. All of these questions were asked on cross-examination of the plaintiffs. The reason which prompted the learned trial judge to sustain the objections and make the rulings complained of is fairly indicated by this statement made during the consideration of one of these objections. “The Court:Under my theory of this case those…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hughes v. Westmoreland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Longenecker v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
- Catanzaro v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Keystone Brewing Co. v. VarzalySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Phila. to Use v. StangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931