Legal Opinion

Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. Root

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1939No. 6 Div. 386PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

As per the agreement of counsel which follows:

“This case is to be tried upon the complaint as amended consisting of two counts and upon the pleading in short by consent under which the defendant will only claim that the monthly premium of $2.22 due February 22, 1937, was never paid on the policy sued on and the plaintiff will claim that said premium was paid, the burden of proof will be upon the defendant to show the failure of payment of said premium as will be alleged by the defendant. It is admitted by both parties that all premiums were duly paid upon said policy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Lauze v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  3. Thompson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Butler v. Standard Life Ins. Co. of the SouthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Gibson v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Life & Casualty Ins. v. PorterfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Pasco Enterprises, Inc. v. Southland Ins. Agency, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API