Chartered Dev. Corp. v. Dist. Ct. (Cottonwood on Alexander)

motion in a September 2010 order in which it ruled that Cottonwood had satisfied NRCP 23's class action prerequisites and could therefore litigate the alleged defects on behalf of its members. Petitioners then filed this petition for a writ of mandamus, contending that the district court failed to undertake a thorough NRCP 23 analysis and that, had the district court done so, it would have concluded that Cottonwood did not satisfy NRCP 23's class action prerequisites. In their writ petition, petitioners ask this court to direct the district court to vacate its September 2010 order." "A writ…