Legal Opinion

Padgett v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 12, 2005No. A05A1874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Georgia Farm) filed a complaint for declaratory judgment to determine its responsibility pursuant to an insurance policy to defend claims made against Phillip Padgett, the passenger of a vehicle involved in a collision. The trial court found that Padgett was not an insured under the insurance policy issued by Georgia Farm and granted Georgia Farm’s motion for summary judgment. Padgett now appeals that ruling. We reverse.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Allstate Insurance v. GrayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Rucker Construction Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Hays v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Thompson v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API