Legal Opinion
In Re Quinlan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 10, 1975PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
137 N.J. Super. 227 (1975)
348 A.2d 801
IN THE MATTER OF KAREN QUINLAN, AN ALLEGED INCOMPETENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided November 10, 1975.
Mr. Paul W. Armstrong argued the cause for petitioners Joseph and Julia Quinlan; (Mr. James M. Crowley of the New York Bar, of counsel; Mr. Armstrong and Mr. Crowley on the briefs).
Mr. Daniel Coburn, guardian ad litem, argued the cause for Karen Quinlan, an alleged incompetent (Mr. Coburn, Ms. Astrid Baumgardner, Ms. Leslie Obus, Mr. Drew Kastner, Mr. Bruce Shaine, legal assistants, on the brief).
Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Matter of Conservatorship of TorresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Leach v. Akron General Medical CenterSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1980
- Delio v. Westchester County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Andrews v. BallardDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1980
- Erlich v. First Nat'l Bank of PrincetonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.