Legal Opinion
State of Arizona, Intervenor-Appellant v. Ernestine W. Hunt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 4, 1969No. 18428_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
The State of Arizona, as intervenor, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, entered on October 25, 1967, granting habeas corpus relief to appellee, Ernestine W. Hunt. Appel-lee has moved to dismiss Arizona’s appeal on the ground that Arizona should not have been allowed to intervene.
In March of 1964, in the Superior Court of Pima County, Arizona, sitting at. Tucson, Ernestine W. Hunt, after a jury trial, was convicted, along with her husband, Dr. Maurice Hunt, of aggravated assault and battery upon their…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- State v. TaconArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Keith v. VolpeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1980
- State v. GoldsmithArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. DropeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.