Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jenkins v. Montgomery

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1911Published

Error to Circuit Court, Eayette County. Action by Kate Jenkins against J. W. Montgomery. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1DissentPoeeenbaRGER, Judge

Regarding the declaration as fatally defective on demurrer, I dissent. What is treated as an ad damnum clause is plainly only an introductory recital, descriptive of the action and the parties. It is not an averment of damages at all and does not purport to be.

As damages constitute the very gist of the action in trespass on the case, I think the ad damnum clause is indespensable, unless waived by failure to demur. It is like the promise in as-sumpsit. Although the declaration states facts from which the law raises a promise, the allegation of the promise cannot be omitted. Grover v. Railroad…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grover v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API