Cassibry v. Cassibry

¶ 19. I dissent. While I agree with this Court’s use of the bright line test of Cook v. Cook, 725 So.2d 205, 206-07 (Miss.1998), and Massingill v. Massingill, 594 So.2d 1173, 1177 (Miss.1992), this case meets such a standard. All pertinent parties were present standing before a judge while a court reporter took down the agreement and acknowledged it. The parties even accepted the record for appeal as correct with the court reporter’s acknowledgment. Given such facts, the record evidences the same as a written document of agreement.

¶ 20. Further, while memorialization is required since the…