Legal Opinion

DiMicele v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heíiek, J.

The appeal here concerns the right of the plaintiff employees of the defendant General Motors Corpora tion to employment benefits under N. J. S. A. 43:21-1 et seq. in these circumstances: Pursuant to notice given its employees and their union, the defendant corporation’s Linden, Yew Jersey, plant was closed to normal operations beginning Thursday, June 28, 1956, and continuing through Wednesday, July 4, 1956, for the purpose of taking the annual inventory. The advance notice of the layoff informed the employees that regular plant operations…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Teichler v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. CHARLES HEADWEAR, INC. v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. DiMicele v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Matter of Estate of FlaschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brady v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Zielenski v. Bd. of Rev., Div. of Emp. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Morgan v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employ. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Parker v. GeraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  5. Bastas v. Bd. of Review Dep't of Labor and Ind.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API