State v. Roberts
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— Having been convicted by a jury upon a charge of unlawful manufacture with intent to sell intoxicating liquor in the court below, appellant moved for a new trial. His motion was based upon all the statutory grounds, but his chief reliance there and on appeal is newly discovered evidence material for him which he could not have discovered with reasonable diligence and produced at the trial.
The only errors assigned are in overruling his motion for a new trial and in entering judgment on the verdict.
The newly discovered evidence is that of one James Raymond. The affidavit supporting the claim…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. StoweWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Molitor v. Blackwell Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. DinasWashington Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FackrellWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Crescent Manufacturing Co. v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1933