Legal Opinion

Bardo v. Monroe County Water Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG. Robert Wither, J.

Plaintiffs served upon defendants’ attorneys a notice for said defendants to admit facts by sworn statement pursuant to section 322 of the Civil Practice Act. Defendants served upon plaintiffs’ attorneys an answer to said notice to admit, and purported to verify it through the affidavit of their attorney, Arthur VD. Chamberlain. Plaintiffs returned said answer upon the ground that it was not duly verified. Defendants move herein to require plaintiffs to accept such answer, and they contend that the verification of defendants’ attorney is proper.

It appears that one of the defendants, Arnold M.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Purdy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Schwarz v. . OppoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Grant v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  5. Paddock v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Teodoro v. Town of BabylonSuffolk County District Court · 1968
  2. Peri v. Inc. Village of East RockawayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API